BorgBase and Lima costs are near identical to BB2/Wasabi, Rsync is considerably more expensive but does offer ransomware-proof immutable backups - I’m toying with whether the high price is worth it or whether I will switch that one to Lima.īTW I had to switch from BB2/Wasabi for Vort+BorgBackup as the storage end needs to run a Borg server, and those two don’t. I’m now using and for the cloud storage, currently also evaluating Lima Labs. I have instead recently gone down the open-source and well-proven Vorta+BorgBackup route. I’ve now ditched Arq 5, no way I was going to upgrade with all the issues being reported. Unlike Amazon S3 and comparable services from Google Cloud Platform and Microsoft Azure, Wasabi does not charge for egress or API requests. When comparing quality of ongoing product support. Reviewers felt that DigitalOcean Spaces meets the needs of their business better than Wasabi Object Storage. Strongly consider Wasabi over Backblaze if You store your files for long periods of time and only access them occasionally. You can sign up for an account and get started with 10GB of storage for free. Reviewers also preferred doing business with DigitalOcean Spaces overall. Storage on Backblaze B2 is cheaper than Wasabi, but Backblaze charges for bandwidth/egress and operations while Wasabi does not. The first step is to create a Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage account so your data has a location to be securely stored. The price of storage is so much alike except for downloads, which are free with wasabi and cost more with Backblaze. Arq 5 was reliable but quite slow, Arq 6 was a unmitigated disaster, and many people are still finding major issues with Arq 7 - and you cannot afford your backup tool to be like that. When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found DigitalOcean Spaces easier to use, set up, and administer. Conclusion Overview of Wasabi vs Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage vs Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage User Case: I want to use either wasabi or Backblaze b2. Synology C2 is amazing, very simple to set up with hyperbackup. I have no issues recommending either to anybody. At the same time C2 Synology needs 349.95) Not sure what region youre in as it differs from region to region, but in the US, currently 5Tb Synology C2 is 249.99/year. Both work perfectly fine, Wasabi is a bit cheaper and a bit faster, but for me it’s pretty marginal. Might however suggest you reconsider using Arq though. Backup to your own storage/location, SFTP, FTP or cloud storage provider (Amazon AWS, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure, Backblaze B2, Wasabi, or other. While it’s a feature of Wasabi and Backblaze B2 to have simple and/or single-tier pricing, this can also be a bug depending on the use case. Backblaze is the cheapest option now (e.g. I used both for approx 2.5TB of backups from Mac and Synology NAS.īoth work perfectly fine, Wasabi is a bit cheaper and a bit faster, but for me it’s pretty marginal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |